Media map of the world tailored to those in power: China and Russia positive, EU negative, Trump the desirable West

CRTA's monitoring for the first half of 2026 finds television reporting on foreign actors sharply skewed - the EU portrayed as an adversary while China and Russia receive near-uniformly positive coverage.
10.07.2026.
7 MINUTES READ
CRTA's monitoring shows that in the first half of 2026 the biased media picture of the world is further entrenched - one in which the EU is increasingly presented as an adversary of Serbia, while China and Russia are portrayed almost exclusively in a positive light.
The EU is increasingly presented as an adversary of Serbia, while China and Russia are portrayed almost exclusively in a positive light
Negative reporting on the EU rises in particular whenever its moves are interpreted as pressure or interference in Serbia's domestic politics, and anti-EU narratives account for as much as 40 percent of all recorded manipulations about foreign actors. At the same time, China receives markedly favorable treatment, especially in May 2026, when Vučić's visit to Beijing is used to glorify China as a global power, but also to present President Vučić and the current authorities as a guarantor of Serbia's development, stability and international standing. The attitude toward the United States remains divided: while previous administrations, the Pentagon and the "deep state" are portrayed negatively, Donald Trump and his administration are increasingly presented as a desirable part of the West and a political opportunity for Serbia. Such reporting does not inform the public about foreign-policy relations; instead it produces a politically useful picture of the world aligned with the messages of those in power.

The results of CRTA's media monitoring for the period from 1 January to 14 June 2026 show that the most-watched news and morning programs on nationally broadcasting televisions continue a long-standing pattern of biased reporting on foreign actors. The European Union is still predominantly presented in a negative context, while Russia and China are almost as a rule portrayed affirmatively. In the case of the United States, the media's stance is not clear-cut: negative narratives about American structures, the Pentagon, previous administrations and the so-called "deep state" remain present, but Donald Trump and his administration are increasingly presented as a political and economic opportunity for Serbia.

The monitoring covered 5,384 mentions of foreign actors in central news broadcasts and morning programs on RTS 1, TV Pink, TV Prva and Happy TV. The most represented foreign actor was the United States, at 35 percent, followed by Russia at 23 percent, the EU at 22 percent, China at 13 percent and NATO at eight percent of mentions. However, how often an actor appears says only how present it is, not how it is portrayed. The EU had 84 percent negative mentions compared with 14 percent positive, while China had 99 percent positive and just one percent negative. Russia was likewise presented predominantly positively, with 88 percent positive mentions against 12 percent negative.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

The US dominates coverage of foreign actors

Number of mentions in TV segments

1
US
2,835
34.6% of all mentions
2
RUSSIA
1,889
23.0% of all mentions
3
EU
1,802
22.0% of all mentions
4
CHINA
1,050
12.8% of all mentions
5
NATO
621
7.6% of all mentions
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
Source: CRTA media monitoring, January 1 - June 14, 2026; Sample: selected national TV channels
CRTA media monitoring 2026

EU coverage is predominantly negative; China and Russia positive

Number of mentions in TV segments

ANTI
PRO
EU
566
106
ANTI 84% · PRO 16%
US
458
338
ANTI 58% · PRO 42%
NATO
221
14
ANTI 94% · PRO 6%
RUSSIA
62
447
ANTI 12% · PRO 88%
CHINA
6
453
ANTI 1% · PRO 99%
Source: CRTA media monitoring, January 1 - June 14, 2026; Sample: selected national TV channels
These findings confirm that anti-Western narratives in Serbian television programs are increasingly concentrated on the European Union. The EU is portrayed as a hypocritical, blackmailing, politically and economically unsuccessful structure that imposes conditions on Serbia, supports the authorities' domestic political opponents and seeks to limit Serbia's relations with Russia and China. By contrast, Russia is presented as a historical ally and protector of Serbian interests, while China is portrayed as a key factor of economic development, stability and the new multipolar order.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

Anti-EU narrative dominates; pro-Russian messaging stays strong

Numbers above bars = share of negative (ANTI) coverage that year

PRO
ANTI
Average negative:EU 73%RUSSIA 13%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Jan-Jun 2026
EU
25%
2017 · PRO 203 (75%) · ANTI 67 (25%)
56%
2018 · PRO 342 (44%) · ANTI 442 (56%)
74%
2019 · PRO 170 (26%) · ANTI 492 (74%)
79%
2020 · PRO 173 (21%) · ANTI 648 (79%)
86%
2021 · PRO 157 (14%) · ANTI 960 (86%)
88%
2022 · PRO 194 (12%) · ANTI 1,409 (88%)
84%
2023 · PRO 183 (16%) · ANTI 979 (84%)
72%
2024 · PRO 270 (28%) · ANTI 693 (72%)
82%
2025 · PRO 214 (18%) · ANTI 944 (82%)
84%
Jan-Jun 2026 · PRO 106 (16%) · ANTI 566 (84%)
RUSSIA
10%
2017 · PRO 272 (90%) · ANTI 30 (10%)
7%
2018 · PRO 509 (93%) · ANTI 37 (7%)
4%
2019 · PRO 528 (96%) · ANTI 20 (4%)
9%
2020 · PRO 551 (91%) · ANTI 53 (9%)
5%
2021 · PRO 848 (95%) · ANTI 43 (5%)
27%
2022 · PRO 1,420 (73%) · ANTI 513 (27%)
20%
2023 · PRO 836 (80%) · ANTI 205 (20%)
20%
2024 · PRO 986 (80%) · ANTI 246 (20%)
22%
2025 · PRO 984 (78%) · ANTI 278 (22%)
12%
Jan-Jun 2026 · PRO 447 (88%) · ANTI 62 (12%)

Dashed line = 50% (negative becomes the majority). Hover a bar for exact figures.

Source: CRTA media monitoring; Sample: selected national TV channels
CRTA media monitoring 2026

China enjoys consistently positive coverage; the EU is targeted by a dominant negative narrative

Numbers above bars = share of negative (ANTI) coverage that year

PRO
ANTI
Average negative:EU 73%CHINA 5%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Jan-Jun 2026
EU
25%
2017 · PRO 203 (75%) · ANTI 67 (25%)
56%
2018 · PRO 342 (44%) · ANTI 442 (56%)
74%
2019 · PRO 170 (26%) · ANTI 492 (74%)
79%
2020 · PRO 173 (21%) · ANTI 648 (79%)
86%
2021 · PRO 157 (14%) · ANTI 960 (86%)
88%
2022 · PRO 194 (12%) · ANTI 1,409 (88%)
84%
2023 · PRO 183 (16%) · ANTI 979 (84%)
72%
2024 · PRO 270 (28%) · ANTI 693 (72%)
82%
2025 · PRO 214 (18%) · ANTI 944 (82%)
84%
Jan-Jun 2026 · PRO 106 (16%) · ANTI 566 (84%)
CHINA
1%
2017 · PRO 109 (99%) · ANTI 1 (1%)
1%
2018 · PRO 203 (99%) · ANTI 3 (1%)
4%
2019 · PRO 243 (96%) · ANTI 9 (4%)
14%
2020 · PRO 383 (86%) · ANTI 60 (14%)
4%
2021 · PRO 484 (96%) · ANTI 22 (4%)
7%
2022 · PRO 432 (93%) · ANTI 31 (7%)
4%
2023 · PRO 498 (96%) · ANTI 23 (4%)
4%
2024 · PRO 649 (96%) · ANTI 30 (4%)
6%
2025 · PRO 471 (94%) · ANTI 29 (6%)
1%
Jan-Jun 2026 · PRO 453 (99%) · ANTI 6 (1%)

Dashed line = 50% (negative becomes the majority). Hover a bar for exact figures.

Source: CRTA media monitoring; Sample: selected national TV channels
Among content assessed as manipulative, anti-EU narratives are by far dominant: they make up 40 percent of all recorded manipulations about foreign actors. That is almost three times more than pro-Russian narratives, which come second at 15 percent, showing that the EU is the central target of manipulative reporting. They are followed by anti-American narratives at 14 percent, pro-Chinese at 12 percent, anti-NATO at 10 percent, while pro-US - that is, pro-Trump - narratives account for nine percent. In other words, manipulations are used not only to discredit political opponents but also to produce a foreign-policy picture of the world in which the EU and NATO are presented as a threat, while authoritarian allies and Trump's America are portrayed as an alternative.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

Anti-EU narratives dominate manipulative media coverage

Number of mentions in TV segments

EU ANTI
40%
RUSSIA PRO
15%
US ANTI
14%
NATO ANTI
10%
CHINA PRO
12%
US PRO
9%
Source: CRTA media monitoring, January 1 - June 14, 2026; Sample: selected national TV channels
It is also significant that the primary source of manipulative content is most often domestic media themselves. Across all observed narratives, Serbian media are by far the most frequent source of manipulative content, with a share of between 67 and 79 percent. This indicates that the negative attitude toward the EU and the affirmative reporting on Russia and China cannot be explained solely by the transmission of foreign sources or the influence of social networks; rather, domestic media actively produce and normalize such narratives.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

Serbian media are the primary source of manipulative content

Serbian media
Social networks
Other
No sources
EU ANTI
79%
12%
CHINA PRO
75%
22%
NATO ANTI
74%
7%
13%
6%
US ANTI
74%
9%
13%
RUSSIA PRO
72%
16%
8%
US PRO
67%
6%
20%
6%
Source: CRTA media monitoring, January 1 - June 14, 2026; Sample: selected national TV channels
CRTA media monitoring 2026

Manipulative narratives: China and Russia framed positively across topics; the EU negatively - even on EU integration

Net tone score: positive minus negative mentions (percentage points)

Foreign policy
War in Ukraine
Domestic policy
Economy
Kosovo
EU integration
+100
Foreign policy: +100
+100
War in Ukraine: +100
+100
Domestic policy: +100
+100
Economy: +100
+100
Kosovo: +100
+100
EU integration: +100
CHINA
+96
Foreign policy: +96
+96
War in Ukraine: +96
+100
Domestic policy: +100
+100
Economy: +100
+100
Kosovo: +100
+100
EU integration: +100
RUSSIA
+17
Foreign policy: +17
-50
War in Ukraine: -50
-31
Domestic policy: -31
-36
Economy: -36
-8
Kosovo: -8
+70
EU integration: +70
US
-98
Foreign policy: -98
-100
War in Ukraine: -100
-97
Domestic policy: -97
-95
Economy: -95
-100
Kosovo: -100
-95
EU integration: -95
EU
-100
Foreign policy: -100
-100
War in Ukraine: -100
-100
Domestic policy: -100
-100
Economy: -100
-100
Kosovo: -100
-100
EU integration: -100
NATO
Source: CRTA media monitoring, January 1 - June 14, 2026; Sample: selected national TV channels
Monthly trends further show that positive reporting on particular actors coincides with the foreign-policy messages of those in power. The most pronounced example is May 2026, when Vučić's visit to China leads to a sharp rise in positive reporting on China. During that period Beijing is presented as the new center of gravity of world politics, while the visits of Putin and Trump to China are used to confirm the narrative that global power is shifting toward the China-Russia-US triangle. At the same time, the EU is portrayed as an actor that seeks to limit Serbia's independent foreign policy and as a power that is becoming ever less relevant in the new global order.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

Authoritarian allies get positive coverage in line with the government narrative; positive EU coverage stays marginal

Number of mentions in TV segments

CHINA PRO
RUSSIA PRO
US PRO
EU PRO
0
60
120
180
240
Jan-25
Feb-25
Mar-25
Apr-25
May-25
Jun-25
Jul-25
Aug-25
Sep-25
Oct-25
Nov-25
Dec-25
Jan-26
Feb-26
Mar-26
Apr-26
May-26
Jun-26
Number of mentions
Month
Pro-US and anti-USAID campaign in Serbian media
Vučić's visit to Moscow during Victory Day
1) Vučić's meeting with Putin 2) Vučić's visit to China 3) The murder of Charlie Kirk
Ursula von der Leyen's visit to Belgrade
1) Vučić's visit to Beijing 2) Putin's and Trump's visits to Beijing
1) EU WB Summit in Tivat 2) EUCO President visit to Belgrade
Jan-25 · CHINA 26 · RUSSIA 57 · US 98 · EU 11
Feb-25 · CHINA 31 · RUSSIA 81 · US 119 · EU 21
Mar-25 · CHINA 25 · RUSSIA 85 · US 117 · EU 28
Apr-25 · CHINA 36 · RUSSIA 76 · US 75 · EU 17
May-25 · CHINA 50 · RUSSIA 150 · US 97 · EU 19
Jun-25 · CHINA 32 · RUSSIA 69 · US 56 · EU 16
Jul-25 · CHINA 37 · RUSSIA 54 · US 48 · EU 14
Aug-25 · CHINA 31 · RUSSIA 52 · US 42 · EU 7
Sep-25 · CHINA 84 · RUSSIA 113 · US 83 · EU 12
Oct-25 · CHINA 44 · RUSSIA 105 · US 67 · EU 26
Nov-25 · CHINA 47 · RUSSIA 58 · US 46 · EU 26
Dec-25 · CHINA 28 · RUSSIA 84 · US 54 · EU 17
Jan-26 · CHINA 28 · RUSSIA 56 · US 56 · EU 26
Feb-26 · CHINA 50 · RUSSIA 65 · US 52 · EU 10
Mar-26 · CHINA 38 · RUSSIA 61 · US 26 · EU 13
Apr-26 · CHINA 63 · RUSSIA 84 · US 60 · EU 18
May-26 · CHINA 219 · RUSSIA 123 · US 70 · EU 18
Jun-26 · CHINA 55 · RUSSIA 58 · US 73 · EU 21
Source: CRTA media monitoring; Sample: selected national TV channels
A similar pattern is seen in negative reporting on the EU. The largest rise in anti-EU sentiment was recorded in April 2026, when the meeting of Marta Kos with Rector Vladan Đokić and the elections in Hungary were used to make claims of alleged EU interference in domestic politics, not only in Serbia but also in other countries. Similar spikes appeared earlier in connection with Vučić's absence from the EU-Western Balkans summit, Kaja Kallas's visit to Serbia and Kosovo, the adoption of Tonino Picula's report, and after criticism of Vučić's visit to Moscow. In all these cases the EU was presented not as a political partner but as a hostile center of power exerting pressure on Serbia.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

Anti-EU sentiment peaks when EU actions are framed as interference in Serbia's domestic politics

Number of anti-EU mentions in TV segments

Aug-24
Aug-24
Sep-24
Sep-24
Oct-24
Oct-24
Nov-24
Nov-24
Dec-24
Dec-24
Jan-25
Jan-25
Feb-25
Feb-25
Mar-25
Mar-25
Apr-25
Apr-25
116
May-25: 116
May-25
Jun-25
Jun-25
103
Jul-25: 103
Jul-25
110
Aug-25: 110
Aug-25
Sep-25
Sep-25
Oct-25
Oct-25
Nov-25
Nov-25
119
Dec-25: 119
Dec-25
130
Jan-26: 130
Jan-26
Feb-26
Feb-26
Mar-26
Mar-26
140
Apr-26: 140
Apr-26
110
May-26: 110
May-26
Jun-26
Jun-26
April 2026
- Marta Kos' meeting with Rector Vladan Đokić - Elections in Hungary
Dec '25 - Jan '26
- Vučić skipping the EU-Western Balkans summit - European Parliament delegation portrayed as hostile
May 2025
- EU pressure over Vučić's Moscow visit - Adoption of Picula's report - Kaja Kallas' visit to Serbia and Kosovo
Jul - Aug '25
- EU silence over Thompson concert in Croatia - Targeting the EU through attacks on Picula, accusing him of involvement in crimes against Serbs
May 2026
- Vučić's visit to China - EU criticism framed as an attempt to limit Serbia's independent foreign policy; the EU portrayed as sidelined by the new global triangle of China, Russia and the US.
Source: CRTA media monitoring; Sample: selected national TV channels
A particular segment of the negative portrayal of the EU concerns Germany. In manipulative narratives it does not always appear as an independent actor but as part of a broader "Berlin-Brussels" mechanism of pressure. Germany is portrayed as a belligerent power pushing Europe toward militarization and conflict with Russia, as an actor that arms Pristina and works against Serbia's territorial integrity, and also through historical references to Nazism and the Second World War. Such narratives do not serve to explain German policy but to discredit it and fit it into the broader image of the EU as a hostile structure.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

Germany is framed as a militant arm of the Berlin-Brussels pressure machine

Germany
Militant pillar of the Berlin-Brussels pressure machine

Framed as a key European power that pressures Serbia, promotes militarization and supports policies hostile to Serbian interests. German policy is portrayed through claims of double standards, rearmament, support for Pristina and historical references to Nazism, depicting it as morally compromised and anti-Serbian.

1. Militarization and future war
Germany is portrayed as pushing Europe toward militarization and future conflict with Russia.
Mitar Kovač: „Germany, the UK and France pursue militant policy and prepare for future war.“
2. Berlin-Brussels pressure on Serbia
Berlin is framed as part of the EU establishment seeking to limit Serbia's independent foreign policy and pressure it over Russia, China, Kosovo and EU accession.
Aleksandar Vučić: „The Berlin-Brussels elite is hostile and intimidates smaller nations.“
3. Support for Pristina
Germany is depicted as supporting or arming Pristina, and therefore acting against Serbia's territorial integrity and security interests.
Vladimir Radomirović: „Germany is arming the authorities in Pristina.“
4. Nazi and WWII references
Historical references to Nazism and WWII are used to delegitimize contemporary German and EU policy as morally compromised and hostile.
Ljubinka Milinčić: „In Germany live the grandchildren of Nazis...“
Source: CRTA media monitoring, May - June 2026; Sample: selected national TV channels
A central role in this media environment is played by the President of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić. In the first half of 2026, 211 of his live appearances on television programs were recorded, with an average duration of approximately 33 minutes. In the periods when Vučić was quoted in segments about foreign actors, China stands out as especially positive, while negative framing is most pronounced toward the EU. In his direct media appearances the most frequent topics are foreign policy, elections and the economy, and the narrative analysis for May and June shows that the glorification of state policy, the glorification of China and the discrediting of political opponents dominate.
Such a concentration of media space around the president is not new in Serbia's media environment; however, when foreign policy is most often interpreted through the messages of a single political actor, and the media convey those messages without critical distance, the public receives not information but a political frame. Within that frame, China and Russia appear as protectors of development and sovereignty, the EU as a source of pressure and humiliation, and Trump's America as a desirable part of the West.
CRTA media monitoring 2026

When Vučić is quoted, China stands out positively, while negative framing concentrates on the EU

Number of mentions in TV segments

Neutral
PRO
ANTI
210
US NEUTRAL: 210
US
NEUTRAL
173
EU NEUTRAL: 173
EU
NEUTRAL
164
RUSSIA NEUTRAL: 164
RUSSIA
NEUTRAL
128
CHINA PRO: 128
CHINA
PRO
77
CHINA NEUTRAL: 77
CHINA
NEUTRAL
60
EU ANTI: 60
EU
ANTI
60
NATO NEUTRAL: 60
NATO
NEUTRAL
53
US PRO: 53
US
PRO
44
EU PRO: 44
EU
PRO
40
RUSSIA PRO: 40
RUSSIA
PRO
28
NATO ANTI: 28
NATO
ANTI
7
US ANTI: 7
US
ANTI
1
CHINA ANTI: 1
CHINA
ANTI
Source: CRTA media monitoring, January 1 - June 14, 2026; Sample: selected national TV channels

Methodology

The monitoring was conducted from 1 January to 14 June 2026. The sample covered central news broadcasts and morning programs on nationally broadcasting televisions: RTS 1, TV Pink, TV Prva and Happy TV. The unit of analysis was mentions of foreign actors in television segments. A total of 5,384 mentions were analyzed. The topics of analysis included politics, military affairs, the economy, Kosovo, the conflicts of the 1990-1999 period, culture, human rights and health.

Related Articles

CRTA.Plus is part of CRTA’s work to document developments related to democracy, the rule of law, and accountability in Serbia.
Crta @ 2026. All rights reserved.