Update
A sitting minister invokes “ethnic cleansing” &#...
A member of the Serbian government has publicly said she would have “ethnically cleansed”...
The findings of the observation mission suggest that, while many technical aspects of the voting process were carried out in accordance with legal provisions, the broader conditions in which the elections took place raise serious concerns about the integrity of the process. Incidents recorded outside polling stations — including violence, intimidation, and the presence of large, sometimes masked groups — point to an environment in which voters and participants may have felt pressure or insecurity when exercising their rights.
Observers also documented a number of irregularities directly related to the voting process, such as breaches of ballot secrecy and cases of voters photographing their ballots, alongside inconsistent responses from polling boards. These issues, combined with overcrowding at polling stations and unclear responsibilities among election staff, indicate weaknesses in the professionalisation and standardisation of election administration.
Beyond election day, the delegation highlighted structural concerns that shaped the campaign environment. These include allegations of pressure on voters and public sector employees, misuse of administrative resources, and significant disparities in campaign conditions. The campaign was described as highly polarised and dominated by national-level actors, while local issues were largely overshadowed. At the same time, media coverage was assessed as unbalanced, with limited access for opposition voices and continued challenges for independent journalism.
Finally, the delegation identified emerging risks, including the presence of a large number of so-called “pseudo-observers” and practices that may confuse voters, such as the use of similar-sounding electoral lists. Taken together, these findings suggest not only persistent structural challenges, but also a deterioration of the electoral environment compared to previous observation cycles.
Finally, the delegation identified emerging risks, including the presence of a large number of so-called “pseudo-observers” and practices that may confuse voters, such as the use of similar-sounding electoral lists. Taken together, these findings suggest not only persistent structural challenges, but also a deterioration of the electoral environment compared to previous observation cycles.
“The report also points to longer-term trends, noting a further blurring of the line between state institutions and the ruling party, as well as concerns about the effectiveness of oversight and enforcement bodies. ”
